Is sufficiently new concept, whether in psychology or in pedagogy, which made the scientists Speak enough about eating in preparations or capabilities or tendencies or personality traits, which represent the psychological characteristics that distinguish individuals. With the concept sufficiently interferes with the view of linguistics to talk about knowledge when the speaker, and being able to produce an infinite number of sentences as well as to understand, so the concept of efficiency is closer to psycholinguistics. It is sufficiently known here as a force ready to do some actions, to: the adequacy of a department, and that practice within the law, a knowledge of good conduct. Sued Ghraib Adequately defined the concept of readiness, a psychological concept, after giving him strength, It is ready to do power, not only willing to do, here are a reference to the level of proficiency that is the willingness of him, but who wants to prepare? Is he ready innate? Or physical readiness, or any kind of preparation is talking about? Has no self-preparation to do the work but can not do Is this enough? It is known that preparation is the ability of the latency as we shall see. The Aldirij indicates that the skills "capabilities acquired permit to conduct work in a particular context, and consists of content knowledge, skills, abilities and attitudes are integrated in a compound, as the individual who gained by raising and the recruitment and employment in order to confront a problem and resolve the status of specific" It has not the capacity but the capacity, not the capacity of innate but acquired educated, shows the impact the behavior of the individual and his work, here are linked to something done without referring to the extent allowed by permit this ability to do the work and the proportion of it, then later found Adakhl in the content of competence between the concepts , became sufficiently contain the capacity of knowledge, skill and ability and a trend, or rather have the knowledge, skills, abilities and attitudes, what is the capacity that have the ability? Perhaps it was intended degree possible the ability possessed by the individual to invest among knowledge, skills and capabilities to solve something. And definition of this is in line with the vision of psychology of language, the scope of linguistic behavior, and the two main Mahourah: Allgoaan acquisition and performance, and share a knowledge of the individual systems.
Efficiency as defined as "the possibility of non-visible include a number of achievements or performances". This suggests not only the possibility to measure achievement or performance, the possibility of internal Valkvaih not watch, but Anjazatha is seen, and therefore shows how closely enough to performance and achievement.
I knew enough that it "rules owned by the person of his language, which is either innate capabilities and templates are born equipped with the person or the rules of voice and grammatical acquired Baankake my words a certain community members. And the ability to use language in a given situation by a particular speaker".
Valkvaih here took two dimensions: a fungal owned language speaker, and after my work belongs to the individual as a result of acquired learning and contact with other, and that the rules in this century, took the dimension of communicative competence, verifies speaker in the use of these rules in certain situations.
As my generation Valkvaih has "a system of conceptual knowledge (intellectual and practical skills) which are organized into papules procedural managed under the category of positions on the task of identifying and resolving problem actively and effectively". Here, combining the mental level and skill level, which are placed in the overlap to come up practical measures to solve the problem a specific activity level of these measures of effectiveness, on the other hand has become sufficiently systems, means a system of diverse knowledge held by the speaker of language.
The Flip Pernod has introduced in its definition is a knowledge resources, says that is enough: "The ability to mobilize the customary set of resources (knowledge, capabilities, information ...) in order to face a number of situations appropriately and effectively". And here we stand at the term which means the ability of the individual being able to able to invest its resources of knowledge and different knowledge and information capabilities to counter what hampered. And close to it, the definition Hamdaoui, Which shows that the efficiency range of capabilities, skills and knowledge, armed with the student to meet a range of situations and obstacles and problems that require finding effective solutions are appropriate, effective, and known also as "a person's ability to activate the resources of knowledge different to meet the specific type of situations" Has enough capacity to link, which also means the person is unable to take advantage of the knowledge resources, but is highlighted here by the focus to accomplish a specific type of situations. Add to the utilitarian aspect that appears in the phrase "activation of resources," but the question still arises is this ability that enables the individual to activate the resources of doing something?What percentage? In order to get to power on the individual owning enough.
There are definitions of procedural learning stems from the approach represented by the owner, if the student's educational enter in the definition, so that shows how the student is unable to take advantage of previous knowledge, whether intellectual or acquired in the face of situations in order to solve them. It appears from this that the concept of adequacy is flexibility, which makes it includes knowledge and skills, and can act against a range of situations, solve problems and adapt to any new condition or complex, to accomplish various tasks. This concept is no longer based on teaching knowledge and restrict the teacher, but now makes the learner at the center of attention, and can be effective to invest in various concrete situations. And interfere with this concept as provided in their statement Allsaon term enough. It is only the inner lining of achievement and the model underlying the acquired and non-visible and noticeable only achievements and behaviors indicative, but achievement is thus expressed sufficiently in the special status belongs to this category, and can use the term task or the result of a sign of achievement and performance, so that the student is able to implement the Fund or what model of wooden boards, this is enough, and achievement is building a wooden box as a specific size, using hand tools with wooden boards to provide appropriate. And therefore has expanded the concept of competence was associated with the willingness to prepare for the power to do, and capabilities associated with acquired That allow behavior, and associated Invisible to the opportunity, has been linked to conceptual knowledge, and the dimension associated with innate capacity, rules and practical dimension. What is the link between these concepts which are in fact indicators of the general concept of adequacy? Is it for synonymy?
التسميات
education