We have revealed to us of the quality of structures Mitamsarh, whether serious or Hazlh, it is actually a critical innovation in the theater, running different mechanisms Kalthoil and irony, heart, and diversification of perspectives and creating confrontation and conflict between the structures of the play, and thus between the literary formats. With these components, work on creating new conditions for receiving and re-examine the perceptions of the built and Alyalaiham Alastailab and interestingness and identification. Perhaps this horizon is the aesthetic dimensions of cash, which helps to achieve the means to play by the theory of creativity within, in line with the orientations of creative and consistent with his view of things and reflect the perspective of art in its relation to reality.
The Almitamsarh employed by these structures interfere with how the vehicle in which the act is already critical and aesthetic theory,
And between the folds of these acts are all leaking creative vision for the world and things. So, we have during the talk about jobs Almitamsarh "to highlight the fundamental, because of a job or several jobs Mahith of plays on the one hand, any function structural, and because the total plays mirror respond, on the other hand, the function of historical should be analyzed".
And invoking this distinction, we see that the Mitamsarh four functions are:
- Post cash.
- Laparoscopic function.
- Interpretive function.
- Position ideology.
Perhaps the opening Almitamsarh as evidence of history - through these posts - that is endorsing the perspective from which we started from the beginning, and on the need to add the hermeneutical dimension of the lattice Almitamsarh as long as the choices reflect the ideological structures that pass through the cash and endoscopic and interpretive creativity of the theater.
التسميات
education