Russian economic activity began, once again, since (1999). Then continues to rise, following a drop in growth in GNP pure, with a (-4.9) in the year (1998), and rose to (5.4%), then (8.3%), then (5.5%), in the past (1999), (2000) and (2001). This was not the result of growth only effect, due to the export of oil and natural gas, one of the strong points of the Russian economy in all circumstances. But progress has been in the industry estimated between 11 to 12% in the years (1999, 2000). It was practically made significant progress in mechanical industries and in chemistry "petrochemical", and in the paper. But also, the new breakthrough in light industry, substantial. It seemed that Russia, taking to move a Qlaqlha time ago, in the economic sphere.
Is no longer as a eternal hibernate. And the process of traffic to the obstructionist barter economy. It became possible to talk about the increase of favor. Returned State, which looked like, was on the way to the loss. And set off again, as an autonomous actor in social life, a phenomenon that can be estimated, in a very easy way, and more cautiously, through its ability to innovate, deduct part of the national wealth.Sources have moved the state, in the ratio of raw national production, from (8.9%) (12.0%), in the year (1999) and then to (16%) in the year (2000). This is an important progress in practice. The budget surplus is, by (2.3%) of the gross national product, in the year (2000)
This is necessary, or inevitable internal balance in Russian society, for the new manifestation of the state, and in the two effects on the international level, Russia could be launched again, as a financial partner negotiated for takeoff, and ensure external debt servicing without difficulty. In addition, the face of actions suspicious and hostile to the United States, has been able to Russia boot for the establishment of military capabilities borders the world, again, and began to allocate (1.7%) of GNP, for the defense, as in (1998), and this percentage rose to ( 2.4%) in the year (1999), and then to 2.7% in the year (2000).And will become a definite risk that Russia had settled all their problems, or even the most important. But it is clear that the Putin era, the era of stability in the Russian social life and the beginning of solving economic problems.
And has led attempts to liberalize the economy chaotic and brutal, in the years (1990 1997), and with the help of advisers from the United States, led or led the country to disaster. And we can not accept diagnosis gelbin of GILPIN, on this point, which is that the collapse of the state, was responsible for the social and economic chaos, during the Russian transition, widely. This type of disaster, which avoided China, to maintain the authoritarian state, in the heart of the process of economic liberalization.
التسميات
markets