Certainly, the issue of education were not curious about the thought of Rousseau, it has dealt with in the framework of political thinking: its purpose the establishment of good citizens and patriots. He has addressed in his article that liberated the political economy of the Encyclopedia In his article about the Government of Bologna. He had an idea strictly, he wanted to be raising children away from their families in the framework of the state. When Rousseau said that the book is the Republic of Plato's theory of education, it was his understanding that the first role of the state is to teach citizens. And that a very important issue can not be left to teachers and parents of Education.
«Certainly, the people that, with time, be as it wanted governments to .anha important point. The education should give souls of national power, guiding their views and Ozugaha so as to be a national desire and passion and necessity »
The integration of education, Palmyra «I» the individual and the offset b «I» the group so that everyone thinks the collective interest before individual interest, and this so-called «virtue». This meaning has been given in the first lines of Emile.
«The good institutions are the institutions that define human change .. transfer ego to the collective unity. »
Emile certainly that deals with education, so it was the subtitle of the book! What does it mean if this concept. The first page is a system of definitions, dealing with nature, corruption, habit, man and citizen. In general, these concepts represent the philosophy of the eighteenth century, this philosophy that tended to distinguish between the natural and the artificial, which were usually fascinated by the power and concentrated on the relationship between natural emotions and political passions.
And then, that all of these questions reflected in the concept of education. In the first place, that education in the common concept is not valid, it is industry for Gay, fine tune it violates nature, it is valid for the policy, as they adapt to the individual with his group and integrate his ego in the collective ego.
After breeding fact, Rousseau defines education in its essence by Triple: education, nature, farming things, raising others. And gives the rest of the book content specific to the Triple enhance nature of the body and liberate human talent, and the evolution of the surrounding human beings and are available to conduct his memory and his mind things, and interfere with the others ranging from sexual lookout when the emergence of feelings relational (friendship, compassion, appreciation).
This triple «educational» Rousseau puts Antervologgio social landscaped base. Vistbad make normal social rights in the state such as the bee in the hive, and the idea of a social contract that makes the state the result of a decision humanitarian account. There is no need for the heart of human nature to become socially, it's nature that make it as well, but to return, these social can not dispense did others, that only can never be socially. The other man is not a reaction to the artificial, imposed by nature, nature makes people work what you want to have right without having the ability to do on their own.
If what he calls Rousseau «education» is only a causal philosophy: any mechanisms, depending on the context of the time, human nature to evolve in the direction of society, and in any mechanisms of this nature can spoil and destroy the real links to humanity? The concept of education answers to these questions.
The breeding Emile is the history of humanity, should have been on that rear humanity itself, that is in every human being the principles of self-Bred, and its transmission of wild nature (brutality) to human nature. The human heart is the same as the human kind in the individual, and the task of Emile is described, which is, in this sense Antervologgio book, the history of human kind as wanted and nature as it should be shown.
التسميات
Philosophy of Education